But whence cometh abstraction? Sure, you can say that all abstractions are generalisations of some category of operations or structures, but that’s shallow and basically useless. There’s more to it.
Abstraction comes from simulation. Computers run simulations of idealised computation; more abstract languages are better at simulating the ideal. Low-level languages deal with real hardware, while high-level languages simulate ideal hardware. A few examples:
- References simulate unstructured memory.
- Garbage collection simulates unbounded memory.
- Dynamic typing simulates lack of typing.
- Threads simulate parallel execution.
- Tail recursion simulates unbounded recursion.
(Depending on how far you want to go with the analogy, recursion simulates a whole bunch of things, including self-reference, fractal structure, and induction.)
Simulation is about removing dependency. A program can depend on manual memory management, but it cannot, by definition, depend on garbage collection. With memory management fully abstracted away, memory management ought to be a nonexistent concept from the perspective of the language.
Your program probably pretends it has infinite memory anyway. Provided your program doesn’t crash, the system does have unbounded memory as far as you know. Most programs that are working properly don’t run out of memory unless they’re deliberately designed to, for lack of a better phrase, fuck shit up.
Similarly, as we all know, threads may actually run on separate cores, and thus truly in parallel—that’s sorta the point. But the thing about a language that offers powerful abstractions for parallelism is that you don’t need to care. It’s taken care of. As far as you need to know, the system can perform an infinite number of computations at once.
Abstractions are (imperfect) simulations of limitlessness. As a language designer, you can (and should) offer pragmatic limitations and safeguards for the benefit of the fallible developer. But to make a more powerful language, you must remove limitations. When you do so, you discover the nature of the underlying simulation—and simulation is abstraction is power.